"sm70- why not Duesenberg?" (sm70-whynotduesenberg)
01/11/2017 at 07:50 • Filed to: None | 1 | 6 |
Although I must say that every aspect of the appearance/color package on that Bentley is disgusting.
Tazio, Count Fouroff
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
01/11/2017 at 08:36 | 1 |
Drophead to drophead?
SidewaysOnDirt still misses Bowie
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
01/11/2017 at 09:39 | 0 |
Bentley drivers are usually pretty good at displaying how money can’t buy taste.
sm70- why not Duesenberg?
> SidewaysOnDirt still misses Bowie
01/11/2017 at 09:57 | 0 |
It’s a shame too, because when spec’d right they can be absolutely stunning. Or at least the last generation of cars were, I really am not a fan of this new grill and headlight set up.
sm70- why not Duesenberg?
> SidewaysOnDirt still misses Bowie
01/11/2017 at 09:57 | 0 |
It’s a shame too, because inspect right they can be absolutely stunning. Or at least the last generation of cars were, I really am not a fan of this new grill and headlight set up.
SidewaysOnDirt still misses Bowie
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
01/11/2017 at 10:23 | 1 |
I feel like people who are going to spec them right will likely buy a Rolls instead.
sm70- why not Duesenberg?
> SidewaysOnDirt still misses Bowie
01/11/2017 at 10:33 | 0 |
Every now and then I see one done up just right, but yeah, they have become a bit nouveau riche.